[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC state
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: VC state |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:28:29 -0700 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> As for a key binding, I don't find C-x v d particularly good anyway, so
> we may as well choose a better one.
Couldn't think of something better, so I left it on C-x v d
Suggestions are welcome... We could change the `vc-status' names to
match the key binding...
> You may also want to add a vc-dired-noselect (which calls vc-status) to
> find-directory-functions, like PCL-CVS does (it's what I always use to
> invoke PCL-CVS).
I'll look into that.
- Re: VC state, (continued)
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/09
- VC development [was Re: VC state], Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/11
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/10
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/09
- Re: VC state,
Dan Nicolaescu <=