[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: undo bug?
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: undo bug? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:52:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> I'm wondering why we have to use last_point_position.
> It seems to be asking for problems because it is delimited by command
> processing, whereas the undo records are delimited by undo-boundary:
> there is a correlation between the two, but no equivalence.
>
> I.e. I suggest we introduce last_undo_boundary_pos and use it in place
> of last_point_position in undo.c.
> It'd be set to PT in Fundo_boundary (which could/should also set
> last_undo_buffer).
Couldn't we do away with undo-boundaries and always undo until the next
recorded position of `point'?
- undo bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2008/04/01
- Re: undo bug?, martin rudalics, 2008/04/01
- Re: undo bug?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2008/04/01
- Re: undo bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/01
- Re: undo bug?,
martin rudalics <=
- Re: undo bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/02
- Re: undo bug?, martin rudalics, 2008/04/01
- Re: undo bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/02
- Re: undo bug?, martin rudalics, 2008/04/02
- Re: undo bug?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/03
- Re: undo bug?, martin rudalics, 2008/04/03