[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame
From: |
paul r |
Subject: |
C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:43:20 +0100 |
I notice today that on emacs -Q, both C-z and C-x C-z are bound to
suspend-frame.
Since a long time now, I have in my .emacs
(global-set-key "\C-z" nil)
And when needed (not often to be honest) I use C-x C-z for suspend-frame
I use C-z as a prefix for emacs-wide personal bindings. I read
somewhere I should use C-c but many modes already use it for
mode-specific bindings, and I feel comfortable with this simple rule :
C-x is for emacs default bindings
C-z is my own space for global emacs bindings, like mpd-next-song
or whatever should be accessible from everywhere
C-b is mode-specific, so any mode is totally free to use this space
for its needs
That way, I ensure my global bindings will never make collision with
emacs default global bindings, nor with mode-specific bindings. But
this is a bit hackish.
Two questions :
- is there a reason why C-z is kept bound on suspend-frame along with C-x C-z ?
- generally, how do you manage your personal bindings ?
-- Paul
- C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame,
paul r <=
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Andreas Schwab, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/25
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/26
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, paul r, 2008/03/28
- Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/29
Re: C-z and C-x C-z are bound to suspend-frame, Johan Bockgård, 2008/03/25