[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: position on changing defaults?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: position on changing defaults? |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:34:06 -0800 |
> > Here are some examples of changes that could be made:
> > - transient-mark, selection with Shift-arrow keys
> >
> > - show-paren-mode on by default
> > - iswitchb-mode on by default
> > - bind ibuffer to C-x C-b
> > - hide-ifdef-mode on by default for C/C++/objc
> > - flyspell-mode on by default for text-mode
>
> I think most of those are fairly innocuous, but iswitchb-mode
> is not --
> it changes a familiar and simple interface to something radically
> different that will very likely confuse newcomers and annoy
> old-timers.
> Making that the default would be a mistake.
So are we discussing these now? Dan said no - and I agree.
If we were discussing them, then my vote would be `no' to iswitchb-mode and
ibuffer as C-x C-b.
Re: position on changing defaults?, David Kastrup, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Bastien, 2008/03/05
Re: position on changing defaults?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Miles Bader, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: position on changing defaults?, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/06