[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:21 -0500 |
Well, indeed the old whitespace-buffer had reported
where the bogus whitespace had happened.
Instead of reporting, the new whitespace-mode
displays visually the bogus whitespace.
Ok, we know what the old whitespace-buffer does.
And we know what the new whitespace-mode does.
Is it ok if the new whitespace-buffer is removed?
What does the new whitespace-buffer do? How does it differ
from whitespace-mode?
Can you make it provide the features of the old whitespace-buffer?
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, (continued)
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/08
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/16
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/17
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/15