|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | RE: compilation-next-error - extra `let' binding? |
Date: | Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:49:30 -0800 |
It also looks like the test in the second branch of this `if' could be just (> n 0), for clarity: (if (zerop n) (unless ...) (setq last (nth 2 (car msg))) (if (>= n 0) ; <== Can't be zero here, anyway. (compilation-loop ...) ...))
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |