Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*

[David Kastrup]

"Marshall, Simon" <address@hidden> writes:

>> I don't see how your argument maps to support this as the most
>> convenient setting.  Which is pretty much what this is supposed to be
>> about.
>
> But I am curious in understanding how, if you are interested in
> compilation output and/or compilation progress, you interact with the
> new *compilation* behaviour.  Do you always scroll through the
> compilation output?

If I am looking for something, sure.

> All 20 pages of it, to use your example?  If you do not, I presume you
> are not interested in the output.  In which case, the default value
> does not matter for you.  If you do, why do you prefer that Emacs does
> not do almost all of the scrolling for you?

Because Emacs' speed of scrolling does not agree with my speed of reading.

-- 
David Kastrup