|
From: | Mark A. Hershberger |
Subject: | Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:43:01 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes: > - Bzr seems to take second place. It has a long term progression path > and support, very strict code quality and clearly defined > development phases. > > BZR may become a GNU package, which would be a reason to prefer it. Another reason to prefer it: stand-alone bzr binaries are available and work *now* in Windows. I've used bzr to do some work on a Windows port of the iHRIS system I'm working on. -- http://hexmode.com/ GPG Fingerprint: 7E15 362D A32C DFAB E4D2 B37A 735E F10A 2DFC BFF5 Ideas create idols; only wonder leads to knowing. -- St. Gregory of Nyssa
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |