[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:51:41 -0800 |
Yoni Rabkin <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I created a new category in etc/TODO: "Simple Tasks". The idea is to
> > put there issues that we know need fixing, and don't require too much
> > expertise.
>
> How is this different from the "Small but important fixes needed in
> existing features" category in the same file? To make my question
> clearer,
>
> I'm wondering what the difference is between "small" and "simple" here
> since in my opinion, if a change requires a lot of knowledge it should
> probably not be called "small" even if it results in only a few lines of
> code.
The entries in the "Small fix" category, even though they are small
(probably require a very small number of lines of code to change), most
of them require a quite high understanding of the code+concepts
involved.
The explanation for "Simple Tasks" states that they "don't require much
emacs knowledge".
If you think anything here is unclear, please propose a better
wording. I don't want this to degenerate in a long long thread on
semantic differences.
- Simple Tasks, new TODO category, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/19
- Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category, Yoni Rabkin, 2008/01/19
- Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category, dhruva, 2008/01/19
- Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/20
- Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/01/20
- w32 issues (was: Re: Simple Tasks, new TODO category), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/20
- Re: w32 issues, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/01/20
- Re: w32 issues, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/20
- Re: w32 issues, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/01/20
- Re: w32 issues, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/20
- Re: w32 issues, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/01/20