[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: status icon support
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: status icon support |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:40:48 +0900 (JST) |
>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:49:42 -0700, Tom Tromey <address@hidden> said:
>>> The introduction of a new Lisp data type for this purpose looks
>>> rather unusual compared with what other kinds of existing objects
>>> do. For example, images, which are more fundamental notion I
>>> think, do not have a dedicated Lisp data type but are represented
>>> by image descriptors that are just lists of the form `(image
>>> . PROPS)'.
> Ok. I suppose I could pretty easily change the lisp-visible
> representation to a cons like (status-icon . N), where N is an index
> into a table in systray.c. What would you think of that?
A tool bar is represented as a keymap. If status icons are similar to
tool bar icons (application-level as opposed to frame-level), the use
of the keymap data structure looks more consistent to me.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: RFC: status icon support, (continued)
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/13
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/13
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, David Kastrup, 2008/01/14
- Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14
Re: RFC: status icon support, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/01/13
Re: RFC: status icon support, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/14