[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invisible
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: invisible |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:53:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> SET_PT_BOTH (pos, pos_byte);
> The latter refuses to position `point' immediately after rear-sticky
> invisible text.
SET_PT_BOTH should only pay attention to `invisible' in the case where
there is also `intangible' properties involved. IIRC you said this
thread was not using intangibility but only invisibility, if so, then
it's a bug in SET_PT_BOTH.
If you do use intangibility, then indeed all bets are off, and
odd/undesirable results are to be expected (yes, I'm biased).
Stefan
- Re: invisible, (continued)
- Re: invisible, Stephen Berman, 2007/11/28
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, Richard Stallman, 2007/11/28
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/29
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: invisible, martin rudalics, 2007/11/23