[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frame-local variables weirdness
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: frame-local variables weirdness |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:51:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> PS: As a matter of fact, I don't even see a need for frame-local variables
> at all: they *are* used currently, but only because they exist.
>
> I see that currently they are not used very much. However, I would
> not have added the feature merely because it made sense. I would
> only have done so if it solved a problem. I would expect there was
> some discussion at the time about reasons to add the feature. Can
> someone find that discussion and see what the motive was?
Maybe it is something better achieved by terminal-local variables.
Those were not available at that time. Just a guess.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/11
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/14
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/17
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/17
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/18
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/19
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/19
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/19
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/20