Re: Unicode-2 version number

[Glenn Morris]

Miles Bader wrote:

> All changes you see in CVS are already "resolved" (even if they're
> not correct :-).
>
> In this case, I resolved it in favor of 23.0.50 because I think the
> unicode branch should never have a version number _less_ than the trunk.
>
> If this causes practical problems, I guess the unicode branch could be
> bumped up to 23.0.51/52/something, I dunno.

As far as I know, once the trunk and unicode branch are in sync (is
this true now?), unicode can just be merged to the trunk, so there'll
be no need for the unicode branch quite soon (?).

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg00180.html

  From: Richard Stallman
  Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?)
  Date:   Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:57:21 -04000

  What we need to do now is merge the multi-tty changes into the
  Unicode-2 branch, then install the Unicode-2 changes into the trunk.