Re: Post-merge issues in VC mode #1: terminology fixes

[Stefan Monnier]

> The code and manual now use the term 'revision' consistently for 
> what we've been inconsistently calling a 'version' or 'revision', that

Thanks.

> I think the manual is going to need more work to reflect the fact that
> RCS-style x.y numbering is being superseded in newer VCs by integer 
> changeset IDs.

Actually, most systems don't use "an integer" either.  There's a lot of
variety out there.  But yes, NN.MM cannot be assumed.

> In general the VC portions of the manual need to be dragged into the
> 21st century; there is way too much focus on ancient VCSes and scant
> coverage of more modern ones.  I'll see what I can do.

Thanks again,


        Stefan