[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simplification of faces
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Simplification of faces |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:32:48 -0400 |
Could you give a simple example of how a current use of `modify-face' would
be replaced with a call to `face-spec-set' or `defface' in your proposal?
You need to write a function like `modify-face' that constructs a face
spec out of the args, and then calls `face-spec-set'.
If you want it to change only certain attributes and leave the others
unchanged, you would need to call frame-attribute to get the values of
the other attributes, and perhaps put them into the spec you
construct, so as to make sure they won't be altered.
- Re: Simplification of faces, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/01
- RE: Simplification of faces, Drew Adams, 2007/10/01
- Re: Simplification of faces,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: Simplification of faces, Drew Adams, 2007/10/02
- Re: Simplification of faces, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/02
- RE: Simplification of faces, Drew Adams, 2007/10/04
- Re: Simplification of faces, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/05
- RE: Simplification of faces, Drew Adams, 2007/10/05
- Re: Simplification of faces, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2007/10/07
- Re: Simplification of faces, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/08