Re: messages override minibuffer input

[Richard Stallman]

    Would it be better to do what Stefan proposed in a previous post?

      Another way to do it is to make such async-messages appear *after*
      the current minibuffer's content (typically enclosed on backets,
      as is done for completion messages).

That method sounds good for some cases.  Maybe it is good for this
case.  The next step is to propose specific conditions in which this
method would be used.