[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:22:58 +0200 |
> From: David O'Toole <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:46:37 -0400
>
> (If you are saying that the name conflict issue is only a "corollary"
> of the policy and not the main reason for it, then what is the reason
> for the policy?)
I don't think it's a good idea for me to explain a policy that isn't
mine. I think Richard at least hinted at his reasons in a recent
message in this thread.
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
Eli Zaretskii <=