[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation
|
From: |
Jason Rumney |
|
Subject: |
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation |
|
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:16:54 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) |
dhruva wrote:
> Using ASYNC read and registering callbacks in wait, I feel we can
> completely do away with threads for sub procs.
Wil this work on Windows 95/98/ME? According to the MSDN docs,
asynchronous reads have limited support, and it is not entirely clear
from the documentation whether the way we handle process I/O would be
included or not.
- QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, dhruva, 2007/08/19
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, dhruva, 2007/08/19
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/20
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Jason Rumney, 2007/08/21
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Davis Herring, 2007/08/21
- Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/21
Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation, Kim F. Storm, 2007/08/19