[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:37:04 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.0 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> > 2) The branch of CVS Emacs, which supports antialiased fonts (unicode-xft?
> > XFT_JHD_BRANCH?) should also be merged into the trunk for the same
> > reason.
>
> emacs-unicode-2 branch already contains antialiased font
> support.
> OK, I didn't realise that. Probably an ignorant question, but are they
> related features?
What do you mean by "they"? "Unicode support" and
"antialiazed font support"? The latter is just a side
effect of supporting client side fonts (e.g. Xft/Freetype).
And support for client side fonts is surely necessary for a
good support of Unicode because many Asian scripts require
OpenType fonts (available only by client side fonts).
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Reitter, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Mathias Dahl, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, csant, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/05
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Neal Becker, 2007/06/06
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jay Belanger, 2007/06/12