[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:17:02 -0400 |
I agree that 2 months is too long to wait. We should merge any changes
from the trunk that were intended for Emacs 22.2 ASAP, then any future
changes targeted for 22.2 should be made in the EMACS_22_BASE branch and
merged to the trunk, not the other way around.
This is a good plan, but I am not convinced that it is enough reason
to rush to merge unicode-2 into the trunk.
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, (continued)
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Kenichi Handa, 2007/06/06
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/06/06
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Chong Yidong, 2007/06/06
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/06
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
- Re: new Emacs maintainer(s)?, Kenichi Handa, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/04
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jason Rumney, 2007/06/04
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Chong Yidong, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Johan Bockgård, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/08