[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2007 20:02:53 -0400 |
You are talking about "the directory".
I'n talking about two specific directories that we would put into the
normal value of load-path, in the order that we choose.
load-path establishes an
_order_, and we can have repetitive elements in this order when the
user installs his own version of some packages intended to override
the system version.
I don't understand the scenario you have in mind, but most people who
add to load-path are lilely to do so by adding directories. Adding
directories which package.el doesn't use won't cause any problem. So
I don't see a problewm here.
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, (continued)
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Trent Buck, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Trent Buck, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, David Kastrup, 2007/05/27
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/27
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, David Kastrup, 2007/05/28
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Michael Olson, 2007/05/29
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/30
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/28