[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding <html> a bit too ti
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding <html> a bit too tight) |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2007 13:39:56 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 11:13:27 +0200
>
> While the release is "imminent", letting HEAD and the release branch
> diverge would likely be impolite.
??? I thought the main reason for cutting the release branch was to
allow development on the trunk without affecting the release. So
what's impolite about committing changes on the trunk now?
> Would it be better etiquette to create or use a different mailing list
> than this one for discussing such work on the unicode-2 branch?
Please don't start another schism.
- unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding <html> a bit too tight), David Kastrup, 2007/05/04
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/04
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/04
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/04
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/04
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/05
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/07
- Re: unicode-2 and multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/07
Re: unicode-2 and multitty, Ulrich Mueller, 2007/05/04
Re: unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding <html> a bit too tight),
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: unicode-2 and multitty (was: html-mode demanding <html> a bit too tight), Richard Stallman, 2007/05/04