[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:05:24 -0400 |
this way, on 32bit systems, strings of up to 3 bytes can be represented with
just a Lisp_String without any `sdata'. On 64bit systems, this can be used
for strings up to 7 bytes long (i.e. almost 50% of all allocated strings,
IIRC). And it can also be used for all the strings in the pure space (no
matter how long), so it saves about 50KB of pure space (can't remember the
exact number, but IIRC it was more than 10KB and less than 100KB).
Sounds good.
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, (continued)
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Johan Bockgård, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Miles Bader, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/25
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Daniel Brockman, 2007/04/26
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/27
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/25
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/24
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/24
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, dmantipov, 2007/04/25
Re: using empty_string as the only "" string, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/26