Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence

[Richard Stallman]

    It's just that the w32 code abuses it by passing it non-terminal events
    (i.e. non-bytes).

I don't understand what you mean by that.  Would you please explain?

    Why should we add hacks to encoded-kbd-mode to work around a bug in the w32
    support, rather than fix this w32 code?

In those abstract terms, both sound good.  But I am not sure
what concrete things you are talking about.  Is one of them
the same as what Handa said was too difficult to do now?

If you propose a different solution that people are
willing to implement now, fine and good.  Otherwise,
you're just arguing for a nonexistent solution, so stop.

    If we can't find this someone, then we should probably leave this bug.

No.

    After all it's been there in one form or another since Emacs-20.

That doesn't change anything.