[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:08:50 +0300 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 19:47:47 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> The Emacs manual already contained advice to use a -*- coding -*-
> string in several places. I have consolidated these, with a few other
> recommendations from this thread, into a new "Init Non-ASCII" subnode.
Thanks. But please always run "make info" after such changes to
verify that your changes work.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/03