[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:18:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:
> Should not pending-undo-list be permanent buffer local?
It is only used when undo is called immediately after undo, any other
command will break the chain.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/30
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/31
- Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/31
Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local?, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31