emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ?


From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ?
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 01:25:35 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux)

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> There's also a change to lisp-mode.el which looks a bit odd:
>>
>> *** ../latest/lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mode.el   2007-03-15 23:55:05.000000000 
>> +0100
>> --- lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mode.el     2007-03-13 14:37:51.000000000 +0100
>> ***************
>> *** 96,102 ****
>>                           (regexp-opt
>>                            '("defun" "defun*" "defsubst" "defmacro"
>>                              "defadvice" "define-skeleton"
>> !                            "define-minor-mode" "define-global-minor-mode"
>>                              "define-globalized-minor-mode"
>>                              "define-derived-mode" "define-generic-mode"
>>                              "define-compiler-macro" "define-modify-macro"
>> --- 96,102 ----
>>                           (regexp-opt
>>                            '("defun" "defun*" "defsubst" "defmacro"
>>                              "defadvice" "define-skeleton"
>> !                            "define-minor-mode" 
>> "define-globalized-minor-mode"
>>                              "define-globalized-minor-mode"
>>                              "define-derived-mode" "define-generic-mode"
>>                              "define-compiler-macro" "define-modify-macro"
>>
>>
>> It looks plain wrong (it replaces define-global-minor-mode with
>> define-globalized-minor-mode which is already in the list)
>
> I think you are looking at it in the wrong order: the first part is the
> current version, which looks correct.

The first part is the current version, the second one is the one that was in
the repository just before the disk crash - so it is not in the wrong order.

I agree that it looks like the second version is wrong and the first
(current) is correct.  So I wonder how the second version it ended up
in my repository on 2007-03-13 -- unless someone committed that change
on 2007-03-12 or 2007-03-13.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]