[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:51:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
> * David Kastrup <address@hidden> [2007-03-11 20:43:13 +0100]:
> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to do
>
> for (;;) {
> errno = 0;
> pid = wait3(&w, WNOHANG | WUNTRACD, 0);
> if (!(pid < 0 && errno == EINTR))
> break;
> sleep(1);
> }
>
> That way, we don't get an obligatory sleep if things happen to work
> without it.
yes - my point was to make the change as small as possible to make it
clear what I want (and minimize opposition). it appears that people do
not mind, so I will modify it along your lines.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
http://honestreporting.com http://palestinefacts.org
http://openvotingconsortium.org http://israelunderattack.slide.com
Liberty is measured in meters: how far one can travel without showing an ID.
- busyloop in sigchld_handler, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/11
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/12
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, David Kastrup, 2007/03/12
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/12
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/11