Re: Special treatment of `term-setup-hook'

[Kim F. Storm]

"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:

> On 12/7/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I would.
>
> Fair enough.
>
>> This is a delicate mechanism, and now is not the time to
>> change it.
>
> OK, but then I would really like someone to answer my original question:
>
> How can
>
>  (and x
>       (run-hooks 'x))
>
> and
>
>  (run-hooks 'x)
>
> be different (other than return value, which isn't used in this case)?

They are different if x is not bound.

But for the case at hand, I don't see the difference either...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk