[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pretest
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Pretest |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:58:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>> "Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 11/19/06, Nick Roberts <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm not telling people what to do, or demanding anything. I'm just
>>>> saying that I don't it is appropriate to delay things for further
>>>> improvements to emacsclient on Windows. If you're going to sum up,
>>>> at least do it accurately.
>>> Lennart is *proposing* changes that would allow emacsclient to
>>> automatically start Emacs if it is not running already.
>>
>> Could anybody summarize what is missing in order to make
>>
>> emacsclient --alternate-editor "emacs --eval '(server-start)'"
>>
>> work for this purpose? That seems simple enough, but I could be
>> likely missing some part of the picture.
>
>
> Perhaps I could answer ;-)
>
> What is missing is something that allows you to just use
>
> emacsclient -n myfile
>
> without doing any setup whatever, without having to start Emacs
> before. It should in my opinion work right out of the box.
Are there really typical use cases which require -n? If so, is there
a need for them to wait for --alternate-editor?
> The reason? The threshold is already high to start to use Emacs. For
> new users it is very important to be able to start immediately right
> after installing Emacs. Otherwise a lot of potential user might
> never start using Emacs.
What is the problem with the invocation I gave? The _technical_
problem? If a shorthand option for that invocation would be
desirable, it would be possible to implement this in about three lines
of code, so why is something different required?
> The possibility to do something like the line you propose should still
> be there, but with my patch you should be able to just use
>
> emacsclient --alternative-editor="whateveryoulike" myfile
>
> instead.
Why would that not work with the existing code? It did work up to
now, didn't it?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Pretest, (continued)
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Lennart Borgman, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, David Kastrup, 2006/11/19
- Re: Pretest, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/19