[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Diff patches
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Diff patches |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:34:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> This is normal: emacs-diffs is indeed a moderated list, it became
> that because it was getting a huge amount of spam when it was
> unmoderated.
I know about the spam. I would have guessed it sufficient to
automatically filter anything where the subject was not "Changes
to..." rather than having a human moderator; but of course that also
requires someone to set it up.
>> It appeared on the list after a larger than normal delay.
>
> I'm the only moderator, and I'm only human... However, I don't see a
> delay in disseminating diffs as crucial.
Just to be clear; I wasn't complaining about the delay at all (thanks
for your anti-spam efforts!); just offering it as a possible
explanation in this case (coincidentally, I just became aware of the
moderation recently).
Re: Diff patches, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/14