[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: message's docstring
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: message's docstring |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:08:21 +0100 |
On 11/12/06, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
That sounds nonsensical. Shouldn't this be
(y-or-n-p (format ...))
instead?
Surely yes. But the fact that it did work till now is because message
returns the message string.
So, either we document it, or document that the result is irrelevant
(but it certainly doesn't look so, looking at the code).
/L/e/k/t/u
- message's docstring, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/11
- Re: message's docstring, David Kastrup, 2006/11/12
- Re: message's docstring,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: message's docstring, David Kastrup, 2006/11/12
- Re: message's docstring, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/12
- Re: message's docstring, David Kastrup, 2006/11/12
- Re: message's docstring, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/11/12
- Re: message's docstring, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/13
Re: message's docstring, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/11/13
Re: message's docstring, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/12