[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS commits and logs
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: CVS commits and logs |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 07:44:23 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > Is this all a matter of Gnus? We could handle Gnus specially.
>
> Primarily Gnus, yes.
>
> Could you explain why you do this in cases that are not in Gnus?
I do this when I do merging. Except for the Gnus 5.10 -> Emacs trunk
case, this merging doesn't occur to the trunk, but on branches (in many
of those cases I don't include changelog entries in the commit log
anyway, because it would make the commit log entries absurdly huge).
If you mostly care about the trunk, then it's safe to say that Gnus is
the only current case where I merge regularly to the trunk (you never
know what the future holds of course).
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: CVS commits and logs, (continued)
Re: CVS commits and logs, Jason Rumney, 2006/11/04
Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/05
Re: CVS commits and logs, Bill Wohler, 2006/11/05
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/05
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/06
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/06
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/07
- Re: CVS commits and logs,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/08
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/08
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Bill Wohler, 2006/11/09
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/10
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/10
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Andreas Schwab, 2006/11/11
- Re: CVS commits and logs, Miles Bader, 2006/11/11
- Switching to Subversion (was: CVS commits and logs), Bill Wohler, 2006/11/11
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Romain Francoise, 2006/11/11
- Re: Switching to Subversion, Bill Wohler, 2006/11/11