[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:49:09 +0900 |
Steve Kargl <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Frankly, I strongly prefer the current error formating.
>
> I agree with FX.
So, _every single detail_ of the current error message format is sacred?
What's being suggested is a fairly minor change -- the bulk of the error
messages would remain exactly the same.
[Surely you recognize the worth of such standardization?]
> Are you aware that gfortran can report errors that span multiple lines?
All we want is enough information to get close; the first line will do
in such cases.
-Miles
--
"Suppose He doesn't give a shit? Suppose there is a God but He
just doesn't give a shit?" [George Carlin]
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steve Kargl, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Angelo Graziosi, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Chong Yidong, 2006/10/31
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/31
Re: Emacs and GFortran, François-Xavier Coudert, 2006/10/30