[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TeX input method
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: TeX input method |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:52:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> But ~ is a different beast.
>>
>> Then what about changing the
>>
>> ~ ->
>> into
>> ~~ ->
>> or
>> ~ ->
>> ~~ -> ~
>>
>> At least this way, the user will get the usual underlining as well
>> as echo-area feedback so she knows what's going on and the NBSP will
>> be reachable with ~ so the user's expectation that it works like TeX
>> won't be too far off.
> I think I would prefer the second variant.
OK would others object?
> It seems closer to the usual accent behavior.
[ I presume you think of a latin-prefix style input-method ]
Odd, I'd think the opposite: with accents, after hitting the accent key, the
accent char is displayed as is (i.e. after hitting just ~, an underlined ~
would be displayed) and if the following key is not one of the special ones,
the accent stays as a normal char.
The first variant behaves like that. The second behaves more like the
" -> `` thingy of LaTeX-mode.
I myself prefer the first variant, because it's less intrusive, but if
people prefer the second (which is closer to the current behavior), I can
live it.
Stefan
- Re: TeX input method, (continued)
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Kenichi Handa, 2006/10/03
- Re: TeX input method, Miles Bader, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, Stefan Monnier, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method, David Kastrup, 2006/10/05
- Re: TeX input method,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: TeX input method, Kim F. Storm, 2006/10/06