[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:56:59 -0400 |
Finlay I do agree that the current handling of passphrases in Emacs is
a serious security problem, which should be solved.
The solution of waiting a while and urging people to start using
gpg-agent is by far the easiest. If you think we need another interim
solution, would you please implement it?
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, (continued)
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Miles Bader, 2006/09/03
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/05
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/05
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Daiki Ueno, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/07
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, gdt, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Miles Bader, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/07
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Sascha Wilde, 2006/09/19
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Florian Weimer, 2006/09/06
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/07
- Re: Security flaw in pgg-gpg-process-region?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/07