[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text_property_stickiness
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: text_property_stickiness |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:33:17 -0400 |
So the only thing we have to worry about are a bunch of lisp-visible
functions, Fdelete_field and so forth. I think it is acceptable for
us to handle this situation by the signalling of an args_out_of_range
error, which, as you pointed out, already happens with the call to
Fget_text_property in text_property_stickiness.
I don't see any problem with that, off hand, but if we go this way
we need to update various doc strings and the Lisp manual.
- text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/24
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/25
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Miles Bader, 2006/06/26
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Chong Yidong, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/29
- Re: text_property_stickiness, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/27
- Re: text_property_stickiness,
Richard Stallman <=