[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:26:55 -0700 |
Hi Sam,
1. address@hidden is the proper list for this kind of question.
Followups there, please.
2. I've wrestled with trying to get Emacs to play well with a
one-frame-per-buffer (by default) behavior for a long time. Take a look at
my library oneonone.el. It might suit you, and, if not, it might give you
some ideas for your own customizations. See
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/OneOnOneEmacs.
HTH.
--
when pop-up-frames is customized to t, the frames proliferate without
end and have to be explicitly deleted.
e.g., C-x m (`compose-mail') now creates a new frame that does not go
away automatically when I hit C-c C-c (`message-send-and-exit').
worse than that, when I hit TAB in the minibuffer, the *Completions*
window is now popped in its own frame, which has keyboard focus (thus
further typing results in errors unless I switch the keyboard focus to
the original frame) and obscures the original frame, hiding what I have
already typed.
--
I want buffers created by the emacs server to show up in their own
frames, so I do
(add-hook 'server-switch-hook 'new-frame)
(custom-set-variables '(server-window 'pop-to-buffer))
the result is that the server buffer is shown both in a new frame and a
new window in an existing frame.
neither *Help*, nor *info*, nor the source are helpful...
- pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, John S. Yates, Jr., 2006/06/06
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/05