Re: delete-process bug

[Kim F. Storm]

address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:

> Oh, well, just that the code in ispell I propose to change used is
> following:
>
>         (process-send-eof ispell-process)
>         (if (eq (ispell-process-status) 'run)
>             (ispell-accept-output 1))
>         (if (eq (ispell-process-status) 'run)
>             (kill-process ispell-process))
>         (while (not (or (eq (ispell-process-status) 'exit)
>                         (eq (ispell-process-status) 'signal)))
>           (sleep-for 0.25)))
>
> So, was the timeout useful or at least meaningful in that case?

Maybe as a safety valve in case the process didn't terminate after being fed 
the EOF.

Using delete-process as you suggested seems much better, indeed.


-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk