Re: delete-process bug

[Kim F. Storm]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> ??? The Windows port already defines SIGCHLD (on src/s/ms-w32.h) and
> uses that definition in w32proc.c, in the fragment I've shown and
> elsewhere.
>
> Where did you see that defining SIGCHLD on Windows will do harm?  If
> it does, we already have that harm.

My err!  I didn't study the code well enough.

I now understand that on MS-Windows, the SIGCHLD signal handler is
still called on process termination, but not by the normal signal
mechanism.

So I'll shut up :-)


-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk