|
From: | Kim F. Storm |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes |
Date: | Mon, 15 May 2006 10:06:54 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes: > But, as emacs-mule is not affected by > unify-8859-on-decoding, we don't have to invent it as long > as we suggest people to use emacs-mule in a problematic > case. So why not _always_ use emacs-mule for .elc files (both on write and on load)? Could it be a problem with existing *.elc files? -- Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |