[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble,
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug |
Date: |
Mon, 8 May 2006 22:59:45 -0500 (CDT) |
Nick Roberts wrote:
Since Miles has provided a patch that fixes the bug you pointed out, there
is no longer an immediate need to purge comint-prompt-regexp in any case
I do not have the impression that Miles' patch fixes the bug with
comint-use-prompt-regexp that I pointed out. Such a fix would require
using the variable comint-get-old-input again.
Note that `comint-insert-input' takes away the possibility that
derived modes had to adapt the behavior of `comint-copy-old-input' to
the peculiarities of the particular derived mode through the variable
comint-get-old-input, a possibility actually used in ielm buffers,
external Lisp buffers and Scheme buffers (and maybe by some external
packages). This also breaks the similarity between RET
(comint-send-input) and C-RET, because RET still uses the variable
comint-get-old-input and thereby still respects mode-specific
implementations.
Was there any reason, other than merely a desire to combine two
somewhat similar commands, to get rid of comint-copy-old-input?
Was anything broken about it?
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, (continued)
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/08
- Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/08
- Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Bob Rogers, 2006/05/08
- Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/08
- comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Bob Rogers, 2006/05/09
- comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/10
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/08
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/08
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug,
Luc Teirlinck <=
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Miles Bader, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Miles Bader, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Nick Roberts, 2006/05/09
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Miles Bader, 2006/05/10
Re: comint-insert-input on non-command lines: A trivial fix, a quibble, and a bug, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/10