[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem report #60
From: |
Stuart D. Herring |
Subject: |
Re: Problem report #60 |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:29:16 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3 |
> So this is fine. It'd be a big bug if t were 0, though, indexing at
> -1
> like that. Looking back up, it seems that if the while loop iterates
> even
> once, t is > 0, but what if the while test fails the first time?
>
> Which while test is that? Which line number?
The while test starts at like 8745 in the problem report (the loop ends at
line 9469). t is incremented unconditionally at line 9338, and the
dangerous indexing/use is at line 9483.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.