[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locate-with-filter
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: locate-with-filter |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:05:22 +1200 |
Luc Teirlinck writes:
> Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> When looking at the value of any variable e.g auto-mode-alist all explicit
> links have been deliberately removed because some were inappropriate
> e.g those for `features'.
>
> As I already said, allowing the user to follow such unplanned "links"
> conveniently (although `C-h f' is not actually that inconvenient for
> occasional use of the type you describe) is a different functionality
> from deliberate links intended as guidance to the user. With the
> alternate change I proposed,...
Richard just asked for an example where the current behaviour is useful. That
was the the context of my reply. If the old behaviour is kept thats good, if
not then so be it.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: locate-with-filter, (continued)
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/28
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/29
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/29
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/30
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/31
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/31
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/14
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15