[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright years
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright years |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:30:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 17:02:59 +0900
>> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>>
>> On 2/9/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > > Yes--just add ", 2006" to each and every file's copyright notice.
>> >
>> > Why is this required? I thought the rules said to only do that
>> > for files on which we actually worked in the year 2006. Suppose
>> > there's a file that wasn't touched in years--why should we
>> > pretend that we did something there in the year 2006?
>>
>> Well by adding the ", 2006", the file has been touched -- and it's
>> 2006... :-)
>
> Right, why in the world didn't I think about it? Thanks!!
That change is not copyrightable, as it does not contain creative
content.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10