[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: better "pr" with gdb-6.4
|
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
|
Subject: |
Re: better "pr" with gdb-6.4 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:04:57 -0800 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Using "pr" when debugging is a bit inconvenient because one has to do:
> >
> > p VARIABLE
> > pr
>
> pp C-VARIABLE
> pv LISP-VARIABLE
Well the same logic applies to these too, you cannot do:
p C-VAR
pp
or
pp C-VAR1 C-VAR2