Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

[David Abrahams]

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:

> In article <address@hidden>, David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If nobody merges the plain-old "ChangeLog" files from the current XFT
>> branch into what I'm doing, and my branch is used in lieu of the
>> current XFT branch everything people have done in those files (in some
>> cases this amounts substantial work) will be lost.  If nobody cares, I
>> can start new files and drop the old ones on the floor.
>
>> Are you telling me that edits made to ChangeLog, NEWS, etc., in the
>> XFT branch are expendable?
>
> No.  I don't know what is done in XFT branch nor how widely
> ChangeLog, etc. are modified.  I've never touched it.
> Please discuss with XFT branch maintainers about what to do
> with the current modification.
>
> I've just shown you how emacs-unicode-2 branch is maintained
> to avoid confliction on future merging, and thought that you
> can use the same method.

Thanks.

> Please note also that all changes to the main trunk are
> periodically (once a week or so) applied also to
> emacs-unicode-2 branch by Miles.

Does somebody maintain a branchpoint tag that indicates the latest
trunk revisions that have been merged into the branch?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com