[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: customize-apropos
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: customize-apropos |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:25:18 -0800 |
We might want to change that text, because it seems to suggest there
was a bug. If it is unusual and occurs only after a special request,
that message is too alarming to fit the situation.
What about the following (the text can barely be any longer than the
string below, or it would look very bad in the Custom buffer):
NO CUSTOMIZATION DATA; use only if you know what you are doing.
I probably shouldn't jump in here, but that text tells me nothing, except to
stay away from the option in question. What's the point of scaring people?
If this is truly dangerous, then we shouldn't show it. If we show it, then
it's for people to use, not to shun.
- Re: customize-apropos, (continued)
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/12
- Re: customize-apropos, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/13
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/13
- RE: customize-apropos,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/13
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/13
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/14
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/15
- RE: customize-apropos, Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: customize-apropos, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: customize-apropos, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/13