[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:06:51 -0500 |
I can make the changes, but I really wonder if a basic and often-used
functionality like NILP should be so dangerous.
I think this change should be made. Is there any reason not to
make it?
*** lisp.h 20 Nov 2005 08:36:34 -0500 1.546
--- lisp.h 07 Dec 2005 10:35:10 -0500
***************
*** 454,460 ****
extern Lisp_Object make_number P_ ((EMACS_INT));
#endif
! #define EQ(x, y) ((x).s.val == (y).s.val && (x).s.type == (y).s.type)
#endif /* NO_UNION_TYPE */
--- 454,460 ----
extern Lisp_Object make_number P_ ((EMACS_INT));
#endif
! #define EQ(x, y) ((x).i == (y).i)
#endif /* NO_UNION_TYPE */
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, (continued)
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Chong Yidong, 2005/12/17
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Kim F. Storm, 2005/12/14
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Kim F. Storm, 2005/12/10
- Pretest? [was: Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object], Nick Roberts, 2005/12/10
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/11
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Ken Raeburn, 2005/12/07
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2005/12/06
- Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object,
Richard M. Stallman <=
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/06
Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/06