[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image size limit?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: image size limit? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:02:19 +0200 |
> From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:56:39 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > But I don't think this limit should be absolute. I think it should be
> > specified as a multiple of the frame height and width, and it should
> > be given as a floating point number. I'd suggest 2.0 as the default
> > for this ratio.
>
> What frame should we then use? The selected frame?
>
> That's not really logical, the frame that issues the call to load an
> image (which is where we check the image size) may not be the frame
> that ends up displaying it.
How about the using display size in pixels (display-pixel-height and
display-pixel-width)?
- Re: image size limit?, (continued)
- Re: image size limit?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/18
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Miles Bader, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/20
- Re: image size limit?,
Eli Zaretskii <=